Developing Equality and Transparency

Creating Equality and Transparency Platon School Model United Nations 2014 | seventh â€9th March 2014 Discussion: Special Political Decolonisation Committee Issue: Promoting great administration and majority rules system through straightforwardness and fairness Understudy Officer: Anastasios Kardamakis Position: Chair Individual INTRODUCTION Regarded Delegates, My name is Anastasis Kardamakis and it is a respect to fill in as an administrator in the front coming fourth PS Model United Nations Conference. I am 16 years of age and I am as of now an understudy of the below average of the Arsakeio High School of Patras. trust that you will all look into the issues of the Political council since they are essential and influence us today. I might want to underwrite individual examination on the various parts of the issues and come arranged to the gathering recognizing your countries’ strategies just as current issues. My last counsel will be to thought of inventive arrangements and have a solid will for support in all systems. Presenting TOPIC â€Å"Addressing todays between connected difficulties requires sound,â forward-looking open approaches and straightforward, responsible governanceâ structures that epitomize solidarity with the least fortunate and generally defenseless Secretary General Ban Ki-moon â€Å"Gender balance is in excess of an objective in itself. It is a precondition for meeting the test of lessening neediness, advancing manageable turn of events and building great governance.† Previous Secretary General Kofi Annan  The first light of the 21st century has been set apart by the boundless access to data and universal endeavors focusing on the insurance of human rights and correspondence all things considered. Both the previously mentioned social patterns are key parts of the all around perceived perfect of majority rule government just as the alleged great administration in the network of countries. In this manner, it is the obligation of each national government and a duty of the United Nations framework to guarantee that each administrative action is straightforward and each gathering has equivalent rights with the others paying little mind to their cause, strict convictions, societal position, sex, instructive and money related foundation as approaches to advance majority rule government and great administration. Meaning OF KEY-TERMS Administration: the movement of administering a nation (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). Administration is considered  «good to the degree where a countrys foundations and procedures are straightforward. Majority rule government: an arrangement of government where all the individuals of a nation can cast a ballot to choose their delegates (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary) Straightforwardness: the reality of being straightforward (Longman word reference of contemporary English). With regards to the state â€Å"transparency† implies that the residents know about the plans and activities of the administration and its organizations. Equity: the reality of being equivalent in rights, status, points of interest and so on ( Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary).The balance frames that are related with the issue are gender,political,religious,racial and legitimate ones. Authentic AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Great popularity based administration and Equality â€Å"In a majority rules system there is, first that generally awe inspiring of ideals, correspondence under the steady gaze of the Law† Herodotus, antiquated Greek history specialist Balance is a key part of vote based system and great administration. At the point when the crowd revolted in France in 1789, among others, they requested equivalent status of the considerable number of residents under the steady gaze of the law and human rights .The female developments all over Europe and America in the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years called for sexual orientation equity and the African individuals rose their arms against the western colonizers in light of the fact that the needed to pick up their freedom and stop the separation inferable from their birthplace. These models from mankind's history affirm how significant sex, social, racial and lawful equity is for the advancement of humankind and the advancement of vote based changes. At the point when all the residents of a country are equivalent, at that point all the sentiments on aggregate issues can be heard and consequently the reason for pluralism is served. Numerous shows have been marked and sancti oned by States focusing on the support of equivalent rights, for example, however not restricted to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW),the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Those settlements ensure and genially underwrite the previously mentioned types of fairness. At the point when ladies are engaged and ready to cast a ballot and work, remote nationals are not reluctant to rehearse their social and strict convictions out in the open. Everybody is dependent upon similar laws and their individual flexibility is guaranteed, at that point the states can accomplish reasonable turn of events, the economy thrives and the ties between the individuals from a general public are tight. Basically, these are the attributes of good administration. So it is clear to anybody that fortifying fair ness of each structure is a strong method to advance great administration and popular government. Great vote based administration and straightforwardness â€Å"Information is the cash of democracy† Thomas Jefferson, third US President As indicated by the United Nations, majority rule government and great administration must be portrayed by straightforwardness. Straightforwardness and all the more explicitly social straightforwardness is the foundation of just administration as it empowers residents wherever to consider organizations and governments responsible for their strategies and execution. It depends on a blend of legislative issues and morals wherein the interests and needs are engaged in the resident. At the point when the residents are completely mindful of the execution of national strategies, crafted by foundations and the activities of their chosen governments, there is trust and better participation among people and the specialists, the open division is liberated from defilement and pay off and the privilege of each individual to know the manner in which his administration demonstrations isn't being manhandled. The new advancements permit the consistent progression of data viewing a country’s s trategies and therefore everybody can be educated about the most recent updates. At the end of the day, straightforwardness gives â€Å"a widespread reason to the arrangement of good records the board frameworks, files, and money related administrative and observing systems† while battling debasement which impedes the privilege of information on the general public. To wrap things up it must be referenced that the huge development toward straightforwardness goes back just in 1990s when global associations such the UN,IMF ( International Monetary Fund) and the World Bank needed to see popularity based practices and stable political Leadership in different Member States. Course of events OF IMPORTANT INCIDENTS Occasions identified with correspondence 1787: United States constitution was the first to incorporate correspondence under the watchful eye of God and Law as the Founding fathers understood this was an approach to advance majority rules system in the recently established State. Be that as it may, this was an untimely explanation since it needed fundamental types of fairness, for example, racial and sexual orientation one and it would accept numerous years to create as a sacred thought. 1789: This year the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was agreed upon. Its first article peruses â€Å"Men are conceived and stay free and equivalent in rights† .This revelation was the establishment of the short French Republic. Neither the French nor the American unrests and their philosophical establishments anyway prompted full sex or political equity. It would take numerous long stretches of insurgencies, women's activist and hostile to separation developments just as wars until equity turned into a fundamental idea of enactment. 1948: The United Nations General Assembly receives the Universal assertion of Human Rights. Its first article peruses â€Å"All individuals are brought into the world free and equivalent in nobility and rights†. This expression isn't simply significant on the grounds that it expressed that any type of separation towards an individual is ban. It additionally advanced majority rule government as most constitutions today incorporate it as their first condition. Numerous Member States of the UN have marked acts or settlements in order to end disparity. One model is the United Kingdom which in 2010 executed Equality Act 2010 that planned for lessening financial imbalances, transforming and orchestrating fairness law and annihilating contrasts in pay among male and female workers. Occasions identified with straightforwardness Some degree of straightforwardness existed in the Athenian majority rule government where there was an arrangement of non military personnel oversight of open assets and the riches and earnings of every single open figure (counting commanders), so they didn't profit by their open positions. In the eighteenth and nineteenth hundreds of years with an ascent in delegate government responsibility and straightforwardness turned out to be a lot more extensive in scope. The U.S. Constitution required the administrative and official branches to distribute laws, guidelines, and procedures. Most western nations however started to embrace household enactment for responsibility and straightforwardness in the 1950s.In expansion to that the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has received measures and proposes model enactment to oversee foundations, for example, partnerships, philanthropic associations, and worker's organizations. The United Kingdom has additionally ordere d exhaustive opportunity of data enactment for the open segment. In 1996, the IMF focused on the significance of advancing great administration in the entirety of its angles, including by guaranteeing the standard of law, improving the proficiency and responsibility of the open area, and handling debasement, as fundamental components of a structure inside which economies can thrive. At last, in 2003 the United Nations embraced the United Nations Convention against debasement (UNCAC) which proposed systems to battle defilement. Significant PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE ISSUE Associations and

Hedonism

Debauchery There is no uncertainty that delight is acceptable. Regardless of whether the joy is passionate or physical; whether we get this joy through taste, contact, sight, aroma, or hearing ;it has no effect. Delight is consistently charming. Actually the words delight and great are generally compatible. Subsequent to seeing a film I preferred, I may tell somebody that the film was pleasurable or that it was acceptable. The two depictions have a positive undertone. Be that as it may, while delight is without a doubt decent, it isn't the most elevated great and surely not by any means the only great, as the Hedonist would say.First, we should take a gander at models all through the world which will demonstrate that joy isn't the most noteworthy great. One model would be a cruel kid molester who gets delight out of assaulting small kids. As indicated by the Hedonist this sickening demonstration would be acceptable on the grounds that the molester is receiving delight in return. Obvi ously they would contend this isn't the delight they talk about on the grounds that it will end up being terrible for the molester over the long haul. He will be sent to prison and be segregated from society, causing him significantly more agony than pleasure.Therefore this would not be a case of Hedonistic joy. However, the Hedonist is making a perilous supposition: the molester will consistently get captured and consistently be rebuffed. Lamentably, this isn't generally the situation. Numerous individuals pull off their violations ordinarily without feeling the fury of equity. So if a molester gets joy out of little kids, is it acceptable? On the off chance that a Hedonist were to answer indeed, at that point it doesn't appear to be a sound philosophical perspective. For another model, we can go to the Holocaust.Over 6,000,000 Jews and endless others were executed on account of the Nazis. While a considerable lot of the Nazis were sickened by the killings (Oscar Schindler was one) a significantly more prominent sum received delight in return. They imagined that they were doing the world a decent by freeing it of the second rate human components. It was this thought prompted a great many merciless passings. However not many Nazis were ever arraigned. Many fled to different nations and proceeded with their lives while never assuming liability for the offensive wrongdoings they committed.In truth, many despite everything felt internally glad for the obligation they had accomplished for the Aryan race. So as per the Hedonist the Nazis were doing nothing incorrectly as long as they were getting joy. By and by this is a hard idea to acknowledge as evident. A Hedonist will say to take a gander at our general public and lives and we will see that we live as indicated by delight. Everybody needs to be upbeat and satisfaction is legitimately corresponded with delight. Be that as it may, truth be told, our general public isn't run on the premise that joy is the most no teworthy good.If it were, our entire equity framework would come up short. In court, a killers barrier would be I got joy out of the killings. As a Hedonist, the appointed authority would then need to liberate the crook. Our constitution is established on the possibility that each individual has the privilege to life, freedom, and the quest for joy, however not delight. Our establishing fathers realized that in the event that our general public depended entirely on joy, at that point individuals would do anything they desired to do at whatever point they needed to do it. A Hedonistic culture would be turbulent and anarchic; it just would not work. Gratification Gratification There is no uncertainty that joy is acceptable. Regardless of whether the joy is enthusiastic or physical; whether we get this delight through taste, contact, sight, fragrance, or hearing ;it has no effect. Delight is consistently pleasant. Actually the words joy and great are frequently tradable. In the wake of seeing a film I enjoyed, I may tell somebody that the film was pleasurable or that it was acceptable. The two portrayals have a positive implication. In any case, while joy is without a doubt decent, it isn't the most elevated great and absolutely not by any means the only great, as the Hedonist would say.First, we should take a gander at models all through the world which will demonstrate that joy isn't the most elevated great. One model would be a cruel kid molester who gets joy out of assaulting small kids. As indicated by the Hedonist this sickening demonstration would be acceptable in light of the fact that the molester is receiving delight in return. Obvio usly they would contend this isn't the delight they discuss on the grounds that it will end up being awful for the molester over the long haul. He will be sent to prison and be shunned from society, causing him considerably more agony than pleasure.Therefore this would not be a case of Hedonistic delight. In any case, the Hedonist is making an exceptionally perilous presumption: the molester will consistently get captured and consistently be rebuffed. Tragically, this isn't generally the situation. Numerous individuals pull off their violations ordinarily without feeling the anger of equity. So if a molester gets delight out of little kids, is it acceptable? On the off chance that a Hedonist were to answer indeed, at that point it doesn't appear to be a sound philosophical perspective. For another model, we can go to the Holocaust.Over 6,000,000 Jews and endless others were executed on account of the Nazis. While a considerable lot of the Nazis were sickened by the killings (Oscar S chindler was one) a significantly more noteworthy sum received joy in return. They imagined that they were doing the world a decent by freeing it of the mediocre human components. It was this thought prompted a large number of ruthless passings. However not very many Nazis were ever arraigned. Many fled to different nations and proceeded with their lives while never assuming liability for the shocking violations they committed.In actuality, many despite everything felt deep down glad for the obligation they had accomplished for the Aryan race. So as per the Hedonist the Nazis were doing nothing incorrectly as long as they were getting joy. Indeed this is a hard idea to acknowledge as evident. A Hedonist will say to take a gander at our general public and lives and we will see that we live as per joy. Everybody needs to be upbeat and bliss is straightforwardly corresponded with delight. In any case, truth be told, our general public isn't run on the premise that delight is the most e levated good.If it were, our entire equity framework would come up short. In court, a killers barrier would be I got delight out of the killings. As a Hedonist, the appointed authority would then need to liberate the crook. Our constitution is established on the possibility that each individual has the privilege to life, freedom, and the quest for joy, yet not delight. Our establishing fathers realized that in the event that our general public depended entirely on delight, at that point individuals would do anything they desired to do at whatever point they needed to do it. A Hedonistic culture would be tumultuous and anarchic; it basically would not work.

Timothy Mc Veigh ( terrorist) Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words - 1

Timothy Mc Veigh ( fear based oppressor) - Research Paper Example The contribution of an American left the entire country in a stun as a large portion of the psychological oppressor assaults in United States were done by an outside office. Timothy McVeigh used to be in United States armed force yet got against the state because of specific occurrences that occurred throughout the entire existence of the US. This article would rotate around the life of Timothy McVeigh and his points in existence with respect to progress and disappointment that he could accomplish throughout everyday life (Michel and Herbeck 2001). Timothy McVeigh was conceived in Pendleton New York in the time of 1968. He had two kin and was the main kid in his family. He experienced childhood in a provincial network close to Buffalo, Niagara and Canada and had an exceptionally upset life since the beginning. His dad was a specialist in the General Motors fabricating plant and his mom used to be a homemaker. His life appeared in strife at an early age when his folks separated from one another when he was ten years of age (CNN News 2001). His adolescence was the most upsetting of all as it saw various kinds of occasions happening all over his life. His folks were not generally around him and he felt their need as was cited by one of his best friend’s mother I just felt for him, she said. His mom wasnt around. The dad filled in for late shifts. The children were distant from everyone else. In any case, he never demonstrated any grieved side to me. He never appeared to be influenced by it. He was continually grinning, cons istently polite.† But his concern was not constrained as it was likewise seen by young men living in the area. As indicated by them McVeigh had an unexpected life in comparison to any of the kid living in the territory as he didn't appear to appreciate the scarcest snapshots of life, for example, the birthday celebrations. Tim had a business mind from an early age and was imaginative in his vocations. Tim was that kind of an individual who enjoyed individuals surrounding him thus he manufactured himself a spooky house in his cellar where he used to call upon his companions. Timothy McVeigh held his own end of the week gambling club

Capital Punishment Essays (1010 words) - Ancient Greek Philosophers

The death penalty Essays (1010 words) - Ancient Greek Philosophers The death penalty During the Greek Golden Age, craftsmanship and reasoning communicated hellenic weltanschauung, their interesting point of view toward the world and lifestyle. Through crafted by specialists, dramatists, and scholars, one can see the two sides of the tangled frameworks of the world, for example, great versus detestable, request versus tumult, security versus transition, relativism versus absolutism and equalization and congruity. The Greeks were realists. They embraced the philosophical principle which says that physical issue is the main reality in the universe; everything else, including thought, feeling, mind and will can be clarified as far as physical laws. Their realism was communicated in an exorbitant respect for common, wonderful material things and concerns. They utilized their craft to show the wonders of humankind and man. The stone carvers of the Golden Age pointed to make agile, solid and splendidly shaped figures. Their craft demonstrated normal positions and attentive articulations as opposed to dynamic fine arts. Their norms of request and parity became norms for old style workmanship in western human advancement. The Greeks were pleased with their sanctuaries and other engineering, made to respect the divine beings and enhance the polis (city-state). Their acclaimed building styles were the substantial Doric segments and the slim looked over Ionian sections. The Parthenon, the Greek sanctuary for the goddess Athena, is a perfect case of balance and extent. The sides of the Parthenon give an optical deception of ideal parity on all sides. Their craving for balance in craftsmanship and engineering speaks to the equalization of the world; request and balance are communicated in the effortlessness of lines and shapes. The subsequent generally structure cooperates to accomplish congruity. In old Greece, open show was more than diversion. It was a type of government funded training. It managed issues of significance to the individuals, for example, the authority of the pioneers, the intensity of the individuals, inquiries of equity, profound quality, wars, harmony, the obligations of the divine beings, family life and city living. Aeschylus expounded on the rages and how they rebuffed man for bad behaviors. This shows he accepted that turmoil would be rebuffed on the grounds that request (and law) is the perfect state. Sophocles is most popular for his plays of Oedipus. Those plays managed family and metro devotion. The Greeks underscored, especially in their plays, the significance of dedication as an objective to take a stab at. We get familiar with a ton about Greek perspectives through their way of thinking, which truly implies the affection for information. The Greeks instructed through a progression of inquiries and answers, so as to all the more likely educate about existence and the universe. The primary savant was Thales. He had faith in absolutism furthermore, endless issue. He said that water was the first issue and that without it, there would be no life. Parmenides expressed that strength and perpetual quality were the hidden states of the universe. He accepted that change is just a dream and that one's faculties can just handle shallow real factors of progress. Heroditus contended with Parmenides saying that change was the fundamental state of the real world. He further guaranteed that all lastingness was bogus. Along these lines he considered things to be normally being in motion rather than a steady state. Democritus contended with both Parmenides and Heroditus. He demanded that there is not all that much and that solitary issue existed. He at that point proceeded to state that everything is made of close to nothing undetectable particles, snared in various plans. He was an atomist. The Greek scholars proceeded to scrutinize the idea of being what's more, the importance of life. Pythagoras was the principal metaphysicist, one who concentrates past physical presence. He had faith in a partition among soul and body, a resistance among great and detestable and among friction and agreement. In the fifth century, the Greeks gained from Sophists, who accepted that the perspectives on society are gauges and the sole estimation of good, truth, equity and excellence. Protagoras was a skeptic. He said that, man is the proportion of all things. He had faith in a consistent motion, and that nothing is completely right or on the other hand wrong, yet subject to change. His view is a lot of like that held by Parmenides. The rationalists at that point posed an inquiry, for example, what might occur if things that weren't right were seen by society as satisfactory? What, for instance,

All the Books! Podcast, Episode #9 New Releases for July 7, 2015

All the Books! Podcast, Episode #9 New Releases for July 7, 2015 This week, Liberty and Rebecca discuss The Invaders, Lucky Us, Speak, and more new releases. This episode is sponsored by Scribd and  Mãn by Kim Thúy. Subscribe to All the  Books! using  RSS or iTunes and never miss a beat book. Books discussed on the show: The Invaders by Karolina Waclawiak Speak by Louisa Hall Secessia by Kent Wascom As If!: The Oral History of Clueless as told by Amy Heckerling and the Cast and Crew  by Jen Chaney Among the Ten Thousand Things by Julia Pierpoint A Map of Betrayal by Ha Jin Bell Weather by Dennis Mahoney Lucky Us by Amy Bloom What were reading: Darconvilles Cat by Alexander Theroux The Mad Feast: An Ecstatic Tour Through Americas Food  by Matthew Gavin Frank More books out today: Foulsham: The Iremonger Trilogy, Book Two by Edward Carey Time Salvager by Wesley Chu A Necessary End by Holly Brown The New Neighbor by Leah Stewart The Next Next Level: A Story of Rap, Friendship, and Almost Giving Up  by Leon Neyfakh The Curious World of Calpurnia Tate by Jacqueline Kelly The Billion Dollar Spy: A True Story of Cold War Espionage and Betrayal by David E Hoffman A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety by Jimmy Carter A, B, C: Three Short Novels by Samuel R Delany Lifes Greatest Secret: The Race to Crack the Genetic Code by Matthew Cobb Green Hell by Ken Bruen Chord by Rick Barot Tender Data by Monica McClure The Insect Farm by Stuart Prebble Taking Pity by David Mark Talk by Linda Rosenkrantz Dexter is Dead by Jeff Lindsay Down Among the Dead Men by Peter Lovesey Those Girls by Chevy Stevens The Hand That Feeds You by AJ Rich The Girl with Seven Names by Hyeonseo Lee You’re Making Me Hate You by Corey Taylor The Small Backs of Children by Lidia Yuknavitch The Way Things Were by Aatish Taseer Ideal by Ayn Rand The Flying Circus by Susan Crandall The Captive Condition by Kevin P. Keating Trollhunters by Guillermo del Toro and Daniel Kraus French Concession by Xiao Bai Signal by Patrick Lee Vienna Melody by Ernst Lothar The Swede by Robert Karjel The Summer of Good Intentions by Wendy Francis You Don’t Have to Live Like This by Benjamin Markovits Forensics: What Bugs, Burns, Prints, DNA and More Tell Us About Crime by Val McDermid The Anger Meridian by Kaylie Jones Little Beasts by Matthew McGevna Vanishing Games by Roger Hobbs Bull Mountain by Brian Panowich Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson The Last Pilot by Benjamin Johncock Pretty Is by Maggie Mitchell The Other Serious: Essays for the New American Generation by Christy Wampole Black Cat Bone: Poems by John Burnside Shapeshifters by Stefan Spjut Turning Into Dwelling: Poems by Christopher Gilbert Suicide Notes from Beautiful Girls Name of the Devil by Andrew Mayne Love and Other Wounds: Stories by Jordan Harper Bradstreet Gate by Robin Kirman The Visitors by Sally Beauman A Possibility of Violence by D. A. Mishani Meanwhile There Are Letters: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and Ross Macdonald edited by Suzanne Marrs and Tom Nolan Strange Animals by Chad Kultgen Newport by Jill Morrow Hardcovers now in paperback: Cutting Teeth by Julia Fierro Friendship by Emily Gould A Brave Man Seven Storeys Tall by Will Chancellor Mambo in Chinatown by Jean Kwok Shirley by Susan Scarf Merrell The Sunrise by Victoria Hislop The Ice Cream Queen of Orchard Street by Susan Jane Gilman Landline by Rainbow Rowell Perfidia by James Ellroy The Secret History of Wonder Woman by Jill Lepore California by Edan Lepucki ____________________ Expand your literary horizons with New Books!, a weekly newsletter spotlighting 3-5 exciting new releases, hand-picked by our very own Liberty Hardy. Sign up now!

Freelancing Forum / Writing Forum, New Additions (Updates)

Freelancing With Us has come a long way over the last few months. The site is still less than  a year old but we have hundreds of articles across dozens of subjects and its getting bigger everyday. I promised to make some big changes when that happened and I have! FWU now has a brand new freelancing and writing forum, we have a few more writers onboard and were also looking to create more opportunities for other writers. Freelancing Forum and Writing Forum In the early days I fielded a lot of questions on Facebook, Twitter and through the sites contact forms. The purpose of Freelance With Us and The Online Writers Companion was that a freelance writer (or any other freelancer) would find all of the advice they needed without any additional help. But as soon as the promotions started, the questions were quick to follow, often before they looked at the site. Unfortunately, I just didnt have the time to keep answering these questions. I understand that a first-time freelancer might need some additional help or reassurance though. So, with a little help from the sites developers, writers and editors, we have launched the Freelance With Us forum. You can use this to ask any question that you want. You can put your questions direct to the writers; ask the community; or just chat with fellow writers and freelancers. To see the forum, just click the link in the header or visit Freelancing.Community. The forum  has a series of ranks, with different permissions at each one. You will find more details regarding the rules in the forum itself. You can also ask one of the mods if youre not sure. Here is a quick rundown: Readers: This is the rank you are given when you first sign-up. You cant use the private messaging system or signatures and your posts will need to be approved. Freelancers: Once you have half a dozen approved posts approved then you will move to this rank. At this point your posts will be added instantly. You can also use the private messaging system, you can add a signature, and you can access the Job Board forum (where you can advertise yourself as a freelancer and apply for jobs offered  exclusively by FWU readers). Writers: You need to be added to this rank by a mod, at which  point you will be given complete access to all forums, including the Writers Corner, where you can submit articles to the site (more details below). You can also apply to moderate the site. Ive left control of the forum in the hands of the sites writers. I will also pop in from time to time. The Writers Companion (Shameless Plug) The Freelance With Us site was created off the back of The Online Writers Companion, my first nonfiction book. The book is coming towards the end of its first print run and will be reprinted. If you want to grab yourself a first edition before they sell out, you can find it in most major   bookstores. Amazon and the Amazon marketplace seems to be one of the best places to buy it right now: The Online Writers Companion on Amazon. I will also look to giveaway some signed copies to members of the forum  at some point. New Writers; Write For Us When I first launched this site I was the only writer. It wasnt easy keeping the content flowing though so I hired a few others. I struggled to find reliable writers in those early days. Only half a dozen have been published on  the site, but Ive trialled 30+ behind the scenes. These days I have two very reliable writers who have published hundreds of articles on the site and who will also be active in the forum. Im also still willing to work with new writers. There is a Write for Us section on the site where you can submit your ideas, but this hasnt been used as I hoped it would. I left the submissions in the hands of a few editors and over the past year they have received hundreds of submissions from people who have submitted  work but havent  leave a name, bio or email address. They have also sifted through countless gambling articles, cookery articles, articles on film, music, and even politics. None of these were  any good to us. And  because there were no contact details, we couldnt respond to the writers  that did get it right. A few weeks ago we  fine-tuned the Write for Us page  to make sure we were clear about what we do and what we want (and so nothing could be submitted without contact details) but we were still getting irrelevant content. So, to make things easier were going to give preferential treatment to anyone who has the Writer rank  on the forum. You can still submit articles through the Write for Us page, but it will likely take weeks for them to be reviewed. By going through the forum you will have a better idea what we are  about. We will also know more about you. More importantly, well have a way of contacting you. That means we can actually publish your article and pay you for it!

Article Analysis The Lockdown , And Sarah Smarsh s...

Author Bryan Stevenson (2014) writes, â€Å"The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned†(p.18). According to the non-profit, Feeding America (2016), in 2015, 43.1 million, or 13.5%, of people in the United States were impoverished. Poverty is a vicious cycle, trapping people and families for generations. The inability to escape poverty is due in part to difficult class mobility in the U.S. but also because certain factors reinforce the idea and state of poverty. Bryan Stevenson’s bestseller Just Mercy, Lindsey Cook’s article â€Å"U.S. Education: Still Separate and Unequal†, Michelle Alexander’s excerpt â€Å"The Lockdown†, and Sarah Smarsh’s â€Å"Poor Teeth† all explore the idea of poverty and the systems that sustain it. While all four readings focus on poverty differently and explore it using different techniques, they all share similar big pict ure ideas about how poverty is fortified through systematic, societal, and psychological efforts. Bryan Stevenson’s 2014 book, Just Mercy, is about â€Å"getting closer to mass incarceration and extreme punishment in America† (Stevenson, 2014, p.14). Stevenson focuses mainly on blatant racism and classism in the poor south by detailing a case he worked on during the 1980s. Throughout the book, Stevenson also analyzes the discrimination poor women, children, and mentally ill people face that often lands them on death row. The 2015 article â€Å"U.S. Education: Still Separate and